Warney

October 28, 2004 8:41 AM

Last night, amongst other things, I was watching day two of the Australia vs India test match. (That's cricket, for those of you who think having two countries involved makes a "World Series").

Now you can say what you like about Shane Warne. He's not the brightest, nor the most couth card in the pack. He's kept the tabloids busy, what with dodgy Indian book-keepers and mobile phone calls to strange women. Most of Australia is glad that he was never made captain, even though from his on-field performance he would have well deserved it.

Watching Warne play cricket, though, you get the impression that the reason he lacks wit off the field is because he's saving it for the game. What Warne (and Australia's other premium, and now veteran bowler, Glenn McGrath) brings to the game is absolute focus. You can see it in his eyes: on form, Warne approaches every delivery utterly convinced that it is going to result in a wicket. Warne bowled twenty-one overs yesterday. That's one hundred and twenty-six balls, each of which was driven with an unshaking conviction that this one would send the batsman back to the pavilion with his bat under his arm.

Players complain that Warne tries to intimidate batsman and umpire alike by appealing everything that's even remotely close. And he does. But he's appealing because when the ball left his hand, he was already convinced he'd got you out. And when you hit him for six, as will commonly happen to slower bowlers, he's twice as focused because you just slogged the ball that should have got you out, and he blames himself and needs to make amends.

So here's to you, Warney. Bit of a joke off the field, dead-set legend on it.

5 Comments

Yes, he is an enigma, our Warnie. And he's unlikely to be around for too many more years, so I reckon we should make sure that we appreciate his wizardry on the field whilst he's still there.

One point of clarification though, Charles. As legendary as Shane Warne is, the term "dead-set legend" should be reserved for the one and only Boonie!

All face Launceston and pray to the likeness of Boonie...

My issue with Warney is the question of whether or not, in fact, he is *still* the best spinner available to Australian selectors. I don't think we can be sure that he is.

Surely, Dizzy, especially with his mullet, must be considered for at least partial legendary status. I mean, he did take Tendulkar's wicket.
(But then, I'm probably a completely biased South Australian!).

I mostly agree, but I think you're pushing it to say he expects a wicket every ball. Like McGrath, there are more 'setup' balls than wicket balls -- you know, the three turners in a row, followed by the straight one (top spinner, flipper, whatever)... I'd say he only bowls one or two wicket balls an over.

Totally focused all the time like you say though, no argument there. And he's also a fool off the field, without a doubt.

Warne is great! I wonder what would have been his bowling figures had he played the 4th Testmatch at Mumbai.

Micheal Clarke: 6WKTS for 9RUNS

India won the match in just over 2 Days!

Comments are no longer being accepted for this blog entry. If you really want to make your voice heard, you can always email me.

Previously: One Step to Improve Your Online Security

Next: Ruby Performance